
Je travaille avec WordHerd sur de nombreux projets de sites web et ils ont toujours répondu à mes attentes ou les dépassé. WordHerd est très facile à utiliser et m'a tenu informés de l'avancement de nos projets tout en respectant les délais.
Pages, articles de blog, formulaires, métadonnées SEO, redirections et adaptation du design. Nous migrions votre contenu et votre structure sans perdre ce qui compte.
"*" indique des champs requis
Pas de spam. Nous répondrons dans un délai d'1 jour ouvrable.
WordPress and Concrete5 are both open source, free CMS platforms offering user-friendly interfaces that users with no coding knowledge can easily work on. However, one key difference between the two is the variety of free modifications available to WordPress users.
Although Concrete5 offers a lot of versatility when it comes to the type of websites that you can design, it has a limited amount of plugins and themes. Consequently, you may have to invest in custom-built themes which can come at a price.
In addition to needing a developer, you have to also work around the fact that there are fewer people who know how to work on Concrete5. Naturally, this equates to a higher price tag for any sort of modifications or customization that you want to achieve on your Concrete5 site.
In contrast, WordPress offers an impressive selection of free themes and plugins that are easy to install and gives rise to more functionality. This also means that WordPress is far more customizable when working on a budget or with limited coding knowledge.
When looking at current web statistics, it is evident that WordPress is catering to a much larger online community when compared to Concrete5. With over millions of websites depending on the former, it is no surprise that the latter is trailing behind in all of its market share segments.
WordPress also has better usage coverage in more website categories and is the leading CMS platform in most developed countries all over the world. Consequently, its support system has grown significantly in order to keep up with the expanding nature of the platform.
The CMS has grown exponentially mainly because of effective collaboration between different developers on a global scale. This enduring effort has also extended towards the platform’s support system, which has become incredibly vast and comprehensive. This means that there are many knowledgeable and qualified support teams and developers, that will be able to guide you through any difficulties that you may experience.
Concrete5, on the other hand, is still home to a rather small community which means it’s not housing a lot of active users on the platform’s public forums as of yet. Consequently, it can be an arduous process to uncover practical solutions for any problem that you may be facing.
When it comes to SEO, you want to invest in a CMS that will give you straightforward optimization options that are easy to apply to all of your web content. Concrete5 fares quite well when it comes to providing users with adequate SEO compatibilities.
Users can insert meta information where needed, and editor blocks allow you to move your content around so that you can best optimize every page or post. Overall users will be able to manage basic aspects of their SEO without needing to add any extensions. However, no one handles SEO optimization quite as well as the plugins available on WordPress.
On this CMS you will have access to more insights when implementing your SEO. In fact, many website owners report that this platform allows them to spend more time investing in content creation and less time figuring out the technicalities of SEO, all the while maintaining a competitive search engine ranking.
Although Concrete5 and WordPress both cater to roughly the same target audience, there is a significant difference in their actual user base. Whilst WordPress caters to every level of expert when it comes to working with a CMS, Concrete5 requires training and some technical knowledge to truly experience all of the CMS’s functionalities.
Additionally, WordPress gives you the option of publishing content from a mobile device through the help of different applications, which is simply not the case when working on Concrete5. You may also struggle a bit more when creating custom fields in Concrete5 as this will require extra coding on your part.
For example, the ability to create custom menus is at first very confusing on Concrete5, and the process itself is a task. On the other hand, in WordPress the process is simple and users can easily assign their location by simply dragging and dropping.
Furthermore, Concrete5’s user and added roles are managed in different setting categories which makes it a bit counterintuitive when compared to the user management in WordPress. Unlike WordPress, this CMS also does not provide you with complete control when it comes to your mark-up output.
Nous n’abandonnons aucun contenu. Chaque type d’actif est inventorié, cartographié et migré avec précision.
Tous les éléments de contenu, la structure, les modèles et les éléments de mise en page de la page sont entièrement conservés.
Les articles, les catégories, les tags et les mappings d’auteurs ont été transférés sans perte de données.
Les images, les fichiers PDF et les documents ont été migrés avec les URL et les alt text intacts.
Les modules de logique de formulaire, de routage des commandes et de conversion ont été réorganisés et testés.
Les titres, les descriptions, les canonicals, les schémas et les données structurées sont conservés.
Mappage complet des URL et configuration de redirections sécurisées pour protéger les positions dans les résultats de recherche.
Une conception de thème parfaite en pixels qui s’harmonise avec l’esthétique de votre site existant.
ACF, les types de post personnalisés et les modèles de données structurées réorganisés dans le CMS de destination.
Non. Nous cartographions les URL, les métadonnées et les redirections afin de préserver l’équité de la recherche.
Oui. Nous migrons les formulaires et reconstruisons les parcours d’automatisation équivalents.
Oui. Nous pouvons adapter votre design existant et améliorer l’expérience utilisateur si nécessaire.
Les délais varient selon la taille et la complexité du site, typiquement allant de quelques semaines à quelques mois.